- Help Center
- Community
- Certified PRO Network
-
ProZ.com general information
-
Account and profile
- Login/Registration
- Profile: general
- Profile: native language
- Profile: referrals
- Profile: fields of expertise
- Profile: languages
- Profile: dynamic content
- Profile: portfolio/sample translations
- Profile: project history
- Profile: services
- Profile: rates
- Profile: social networking
- Profile: identity verification
- Profile: CV/resume
- Profile: credentials
- Profile: contact information
- Profile: bio
- Profile: availability calendar
- Profile: tabs
- Profile: translator feedback (WWA)
- Profile: directory ranking
- Browniz points
- ProZ.com wallet
- Membership: general
- Professional membership
- Business membership
- Business page
- Professional Premium Membership: website
-
Billing and payment
-
Email and notifications
-
Jobs and directories
-
Education
-
Community
- Forums
- Podcasts
- Translation events
- Powwows
- WIWO (What I'm Working On)
- Certified PRO Network
- Translation teams
- Translation contests
- Exchange
- Translator Playground
- ProZ.com community choice awards
- Mentoring program
- ProZ.com moderators
- ProZ.com website localization
- Localization project
- Quick polls
- Justin Chlebus Memorial Scholarship Fund
- ProZ.com local
-
Terminology
-
Tools
-
ProZ*Pay
-
Remote interpreter pool
-
Native speaking conversation
I understand that peer reviews can play an important part in the screening process. How, then, was the initial group of Certified PROs selected?
For the core group, a verified, tested credential from a major association was required. In addition it was necessary that there be clear evidence of business reliability, good citizenship, ie. agreeing to be bound by the professional guidelines as a condition of participation as well. These select members were contacted and screened on a person-by-person basis.